I then moved my annotated images back to the unassigned section, and tried to start an auto label task using my improved model :
but I’m getting this error as soon I press the generate test results button :
" Error Generating Test Results
There was an error running your Automatic Labeling test. Please try again."
Am I not supposed to specifically use this process to re-annotate all the remaining images with the improved model, then approve the annotations again to improve it, re-train it etc. ?
Hey! Super Cool Project! You are using the auto labeling exactly the way its supposed to be used, good job. I hate that things aren’t working for you. Lets see if we can get it sorted out.
Ive got a couple questions:
How did you train the model? was it trained locally and uploaded to roboflow? or was it trained with training credits?
the reason I ask is because there might be an issue with the model format transferring over into the auto label feature. Its still in beta so I could see that being an issue
Has it worked since this post? I know i’ve run into issues like this before and they just worked after some time. It could be an internal issue at the time, but isn’t present now. I just tested out the auto label feature on my dataset and it seems to be working correctly, so hopefully yours is too now.
like I said, auto labeling is in beta so its expected to have issues here and there, but I hope that we get it figured out. Your project looks awesome, and auto labeling will be a huge help.
Hey @silkyclouds - if you’re still seeing errors, do you mind posting a screenshot of what you’re seeing with the dev console open (cmd+option+i on a mac), make sure to click to Console
I guess I’ll have to use this on premise indeed. I don’t believe anyone that use your tool in a non-business environment can afford to spend 249$ monthly to train a model.
May I ask you if any of the suggested options above provides auto labeling assuming all processing will happen on my own GPU (I have a 3090 that should fit I guess?)
Yes I am digging the docs now, seems quite easy to run on premise indeed. Thanks for letting me know about that ! (and too bad you guys don’t have cheaper subs for “private tinkerers”, as your webUI is great! )
I did remove the “person” class as I am not in need of this type of object for my project, so I guess the next training will have higher values.
As I cannot generate the .pt model to use locally, I downloaded the dataset, and had to train it again using ultralytics tool.
Thing is, once I’m using the generated .pt file in my real-time analysis CCTV script, the results are terrible. cars are taken for trucks, I can see a LOT of vehicles like quite visible cars passing by without being detected…
I guess I’m doing something wrong here. what should I do to take advantage of the current map of my roboflow trained model, and apply it to my real-life cctv images ?
I tried to use the custom model training snippet, but it wont accept my (verified and it is the right one) API key :
RuntimeError: {
"error": {
"message": "This API key does not exist (or has been revoked).",
"status": 401,
"type": "OAuthException",
"hint": "You may retrieve your API key via the Roboflow Dashboard. Go to Account > Roboflow Keys to retrieve yours.",
Thank you for the kind answer and interest @njmarraccini! As @Jacob_Witt told me, there is no option to use roboflow without spending 250$ monthly to train my model.
As I am not a business, but an individual, this is simply a the budget I want allow to this project.
So, I downloaded my dataset and I am now using Ultralytics to re-train my model on one of my home servers with a dedicated 3090, in YOLO11 format, with no issues.